ABT vs MDT

Abbott Laboratories and Medtronic, both Healthcare

Abbott Laboratories is the larger company at $154B against $102B. On trailing earnings MDT is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 24.6 against 31.9, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MDT returned +5.4% against -11% for ABT. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts MDT ahead, 8/10 against 7/10.

Abbott Laboratories and Medtroniccompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureABTMDT
Last close$114$92.01
Market cap$154B$102B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better31.924.6
Dividend yield2.1%3.1%
1-year return-11%+5.4%
5-year return+3.2%-19%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–107/108/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Abbott Laboratories

Revenue of $11B in Q1 2026, net income $1.1B. Its largest reported line is Nutritional Products, 41% of the disclosed total.

Medtronic

Revenue of $9.8B in Q4 2026, net income $1.2B. Its largest reported line is Total Other Countries Excluding Ireland, 100% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.