ABT vs EW

Abbott Laboratories and Edwards Lifesciences, both Healthcare

Abbott Laboratories is the larger company at $154B against $50B. On trailing earnings ABT is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 31.9 against 52.2, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year EW returned +15% against -11% for ABT.

Abbott Laboratories and Edwards Lifesciencescompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureABTEW
Last close$114$90.77
Market cap$154B$50B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better31.952.2
Dividend yield2.1%n/a
1-year return-11%+15%
5-year return+3.2%-19%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–107/107/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Abbott Laboratories

Revenue of $11B in Q1 2026, net income $1.1B. Its largest reported line is Nutritional Products, 41% of the disclosed total.

Edwards Lifesciences

Revenue of $1.7B in Q2 2026, net income $241M. Its largest reported line is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, 73% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.