SLGSL Green Realty Corp.
Is it safe?
Nothing alarming, nothing pristine: insiders quiet, comfortable debt (A), and typical volatility.
Insiders were net sellers (-$2.3M, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.
Investment-grade balance sheet. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -77% · now 19% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can SLG take a bad year?
SL Green Realty Corp. carries $2.32B of net debt at 2.51× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q1 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 2.51×
Net debt / EBITDA · −0.11× a year ago · the load is going up
- Cash runway
- 0.2 years
Cash runway · burning $192M a quarter at the current rate
- Annualised volatility
- 37%
Annualised volatility · roughly twice as jumpy as the market
Details›
- Total debtQ1 2026
- $2.49B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $169M
- Net debt
- $2.32B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $924M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $661M
- Debt / equity
- 0.70×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 2.70×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 37%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −77%
- Below its 52-week high
- 19%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
REIT, Office
The closest names by size in the same industry