RVTYRevvity
Is it safe?
Strong, no red flags: a safe balance sheet and comfortable debt (AA).
Financially healthy, low distress risk Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Insiders were net sellers (-$1.3M, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.
Rock-solid balance sheet, low leverage. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Moderate price swings, typical volatility. Worst drawdown -59% · now 2% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Dec 28, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can RVTY take a bad year?
Revvity carries $2.18B of net debt at 3.62× EBITDA: a load its earnings can carry.
Net debt · as at Q2 2026 · between two and four years of EBITDA, normal for a stable business
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 3.62×
Net debt / EBITDA · 3.60× a year ago · the load is going up
- Altman Z-score
- 2.56
Altman Z-score · grey zone, between 1.8 and 3
- Interest cover
- 3.82×
Interest cover · operating profit covers the interest bill, with room to spare
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $3.21B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $1.02B
- Net debt
- $2.18B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $602M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $359M
- Debt / equity
- 0.44×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 5.32×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 38%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −59%
- Below its 52-week high
- 2.1%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Diagnostics & Research
The closest names by size in the same industry