PRKSUnited Parks & Resorts Inc.
Is it safe?
Solid, nothing alarming: heavy debt (BB) and big price swings.
Mixed, watch the balance sheet Altman Z-score, a bankruptcy-risk model from five balance-sheet ratios.
Insiders were net sellers (-$334K, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026), selling is often routine.
Moderately leveraged. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -80% · now 41% below its 52-week high.
Unless marked, from SEC EDGAR, as of Dec 31, 2025.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can PRKS take a bad year?
United Parks & Resorts Inc. carries $2.26B of net debt at 4.54× EBITDA: a heavy load to carry through a bad year.
Net debt · as at Q2 2026 · over four years of earnings before interest, tax and depreciation, heavy
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 4.54×
Net debt / EBITDA · 3.39× a year ago · the load is going up
- Altman Z-score
- 1.91
Altman Z-score · grey zone, between 1.8 and 3
- Interest cover
- 2.43×
Interest cover · operating profit covers the interest bill, with room to spare
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $2.28B
- Cash and short-term investments
- $19M
- Net debt
- $2.26B
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $497M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $317M
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 4.58×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 46%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −80%
- Below its 52-week high
- 41%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.