MTLSMaterialise NV
Is it safe?
Mostly sound, with a caveat: comfortable debt (AA), but big price swings.
Net cash and profitable. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -95% · now 4% below its 52-week high.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can MTLS take a bad year?
Materialise NV holds $69M more cash than debt, so a bad year is a question about profits, not about lenders.
Net cash
- Net debt / EBITDA
- net cash
Net debt / EBITDA · no net borrowings to measure against earnings
- Interest cover
- 7.26×
Interest cover · operating profit covers the interest bill several times over
- Annualised volatility
- 55%
Annualised volatility · roughly twice as jumpy as the market
Details›
- Total debtFY2024
- $34M
- Cash and short-term investments
- $102M
- Net cash
- $69M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $13M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $9.4M
- Debt / equity
- 0.14×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 2.66×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 55%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −95%
- Below its 52-week high
- 4.0%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Software, Application
Ranks #35 of 96 by RyuScore