CDNLCardinal Infrastructure Group Inc.
Is it safe?
Mostly sound, with a caveat: insiders buying and comfortable debt (AA), but big price swings.
Multiple insiders bought with their own money (net +$8.5M, 90 days to Oct 8, 2026).
Net cash and profitable. A rule of thumb on leverage, not a credit rating.
Large price swings, high volatility. Worst drawdown -77% · now 77% below its 52-week high.
Against the whole market›
Percentile against every name Ryufin tracks. Higher is better; the tick marks the middle of the market. Context, not one of the checks above.
Where this answer is blind. Altman sits structurally low for utilities and pipelines; Beneish runs high for fast growers, since sales growth alone lifts it; banks and REITs are excluded.
Can CDNL take a bad year?
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. holds $328M more cash than debt, and is burning $4.6M a quarter, about 18.6 years of cover.
Net cash
- Net debt / EBITDA
- net cash
Net debt / EBITDA · no net borrowings to measure against earnings
- Cash runway
- 5+ years
Cash runway · burning $4.6M a quarter at the current rate
- Annualised volatility
- 103%
Annualised volatility · three times the market's own swing
Details›
- Total debtQ2 2026
- $11M
- Cash and short-term investments
- $339M
- Net cash
- $328M
- EBITDA, trailing twelve months
- $74M
- Operating profit, trailing twelve months
- $50M
- Debt / equity
- 0.02×
- Total debt / EBITDA
- 0.15×
- Annualised volatilitytwo years of daily moves
- 103%
- Worst drawdown on file
- −77%
- Below its 52-week high
- 77%
Balance sheet from SEC filings; drawdown and volatility from end-of-day closes; Altman Z from the filed statements.
Engineering & Construction
The closest names by size in the same industry