PBF vs VLO
PBF Energy Inc. and Valero Energy, both Energy
Valero Energy is the larger company at $125B against $10B. On trailing earnings PBF is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 7.5 against 18.1, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year PBF returned +184% against +173% for VLO. The RyuScore puts VLO ahead, 76 against 66 out of 100.
| Figure | PBF | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $85.02 | $436 |
| Market cap | $10B | $125B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 7.5 | 18.1 |
| Dividend yield | n/a | 1.0% |
| 1-year return | +184% | +173% |
| 5-year return | +828% | +683% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 66/100 | 76/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
PBF Energy Inc.
Revenue of $12B in Q2 2026, net income $906M. Its largest reported line is Gasoline And Distillate, 88% of the disclosed total.
Valero Energy
Revenue of $44B in Q2 2026, net income $3.7B. Its largest reported line is Distillates, 47% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.