ICE vs MCO

Intercontinental Exchange and Moody's Corporation, both Financial Services

Moody's Corporation is the larger company at $79B against $76B. On trailing earnings ICE is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 22.1 against 29.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MCO returned -3.1% against -7.8% for ICE. The RyuScore puts MCO ahead, 71 against 64 out of 100.

Intercontinental Exchange and Moody's Corporation compared on valuation, return and the RyuScore
FigureICEMCO
Last close$156$464
Market cap$76B$79B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better22.129.4
Dividend yield1.2%0.8%
1-year return-7.8%-3.1%
5-year return+41%+28%
RyuScoresector-relative, 1–1064/10071/100

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

Intercontinental Exchange

Revenue of $3.6B in Q2 2026, net income $958M. Its largest reported line is Cash Equityand Equity Options, 30% of the disclosed total.

Moody's Corporation

Revenue of $2.2B in Q2 2026, net income $878M. Its largest reported line is Other Product Lines, 12% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.