ECL vs SQM
Ecolab and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A., both Basic Materials
Ecolab is the larger company at $76B against $21B. On trailing earnings SQM is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 26.6 against 37.8, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year SQM returned +49% against +7.3% for ECL. The RyuScore puts SQM ahead, 76 against 63 out of 100.
| Figure | ECL | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $282 | $63.91 |
| Market cap | $76B | $21B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 37.8 | 26.6 |
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | n/a |
| 1-year return | +7.3% | +49% |
| 5-year return | +32% | +42% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 63/100 | 76/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Ecolab
Revenue of $4.4B in Q2 2026, net income $539M. Its largest reported line is United States, 43% of the disclosed total.
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.