CSL vs MAS
Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Masco, both Industrials
Masco is the larger company at $14B against $13B. On trailing earnings MAS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 17.1 against 18.3, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MAS returned -3.2% against -4.7% for CSL. The RyuScore puts CSL ahead, 82 against 79 out of 100.
| Figure | CSL | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $320 | $68.97 |
| Market cap | $13B | $14B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 18.3 | 17.1 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| 1-year return | -4.7% | -3.2% |
| 5-year return | +71% | +28% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 82/100 | 79/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Revenue of $1.6B in Q2 2026, net income $255M. Its largest reported line is United States, 84% of the disclosed total.
Masco
Revenue of $1.9B in Q1 2026, net income $213M. Its largest reported line is North America, 67% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.