CME vs SPGI

CME Group and S&P Global, both Financial Services

S&P Global is the larger company at $122B against $89B. On trailing earnings CME is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 23.8 against 27.6, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CME returned +3.8% against -22% for SPGI. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts CME ahead, 7/10 against 6/10.

CME Group and S&P Globalcompared on valuation, return and Ryufin’s Smart Score
FigureCMESPGI
Last close$281$437
Market cap$89B$122B
Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better23.827.6
Dividend yield1.8%0.9%
1-year return+3.8%-22%
5-year return+63%+6.2%
Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–107/106/10

Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.

CME Group

Revenue of $1.7B in Q2 2026, net income $1.0B. Its largest reported line is Clearingandtransactionfees, 79% of the disclosed total.

S&P Global

Revenue of $4.2B in Q1 2026, net income $1.4B. Its largest reported line is Market Intelligence, 31% of the disclosed total.

Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.