CBOE vs TRU
Cboe Global Markets and TransUnion, both Financial Services
Cboe Global Markets is the larger company at $26B against $12B. On trailing earnings TRU is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 23.4 against 26.7, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CBOE returned +27% against -6.1% for TRU. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts CBOE ahead, 8/10 against 5/10.
| Figure | CBOE | TRU |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $313 | $84.52 |
| Market cap | $26B | $12B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 26.7 | 23.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| 1-year return | +27% | -6.1% |
| 5-year return | +180% | -28% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Cboe Global Markets
Revenue of $1.3B in Q1 2026, net income $386M. Its largest reported line is Derivatives Markets, 47% of the disclosed total.
TransUnion
Revenue of $1.2B in Q1 2026, net income $397M. Its largest reported line is US Markets, 91% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.