CARR vs MAS
Carrier Global and Masco, both Industrials
Carrier Global is the larger company at $46B against $14B. On trailing earnings MAS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 17.1 against 36.2, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year MAS returned -3.2% against -7.2% for CARR. The RyuScore puts MAS ahead, 79 against 54 out of 100.
| Figure | CARR | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $55.41 | $68.97 |
| Market cap | $46B | $14B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 36.2 | 17.1 |
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| 1-year return | -7.2% | -3.2% |
| 5-year return | +7.8% | +28% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 54/100 | 79/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Carrier Global
Revenue of $5.3B in Q1 2026, net income $238M. Its largest reported line is Climate Solutions Americas, 54% of the disclosed total.
Masco
Revenue of $1.9B in Q1 2026, net income $213M. Its largest reported line is North America, 67% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.