BE vs VRT
Bloom Energy Corporation and Vertiv, both Industrials
Vertiv is the larger company at $128B against $88B. Over the past year BE returned +230% against +71% for VRT. The RyuScore puts VRT ahead, 48 against 15 out of 100.
| Figure | BE | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $280 | $243 |
| Market cap | $88B | $128B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | n/a | 55.0 |
| 1-year return | +230% | +71% |
| 5-year return | +1326% | +918% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 15/100 | 48/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Bloom Energy Corporation
Revenue of $751M in Q1 2026, net income $74M. Its largest reported line is Service, 53% of the disclosed total.
Vertiv
Revenue of $3.3B in Q2 2026, net income $498M. Its largest reported line is Product Excluding Spares, 62% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.