APH vs CLS
Amphenol and Celestica Inc., both Technology
Amphenol is the larger company at $202B against $43B. On trailing earnings CLS is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 37.2 against 40.4, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CLS returned +53% against +48% for APH. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts APH ahead, 9/10 against 8/10.
| Figure | APH | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $161 | $308 |
| Market cap | $202B | $43B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 40.4 | 37.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | n/a |
| 1-year return | +48% | +53% |
| 5-year return | +366% | +3348% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Amphenol
Revenue of $8.8B in Q2 2026, net income $1.8B. Its largest reported line is Communications Solutions, 59% of the disclosed total.
Celestica Inc.
Revenue of $4.0B in Q1 2026, net income $212M. Its largest reported line is CCS, 75% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.