APH vs CLS
Amphenol and Celestica Inc., both Technology
Amphenol is the larger company at $202B against $42B. On trailing earnings APH is the cheaper of the two at a P/E of 21.9 against 37.7, a gap that is only a bargain if the two are growing at similar rates. Over the past year CLS returned +43% against -28% for APH. The RyuScore puts CLS ahead, 71 against 70 out of 100.
| Figure | APH | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $87.22 | $362 |
| Market cap | $202B | $42B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 21.9 | 37.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | n/a |
| 1-year return | -28% | +43% |
| 5-year return | +140% | +4100% |
| RyuScoresector-relative, 1–10 | 70/100 | 71/100 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
Amphenol
Revenue of $8.8B in Q2 2026, net income $1.8B. Its largest reported line is Communications Solutions, 61% of the disclosed total.
Celestica Inc.
Revenue of $4.7B in Q2 2026, net income $369M. Its largest reported line is CCS, 75% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or see the correlation.