ACM vs FLR
AECOM and Fluor Corporation, both Industrials
AECOM is the larger company at $8.8B against $7.5B. Over the past year FLR returned +18% against -45% for ACM. Ryufin's sector-relative Smart Score puts ACM ahead, 7/10 against 4/10.
| Figure | ACM | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $65.07 | $52.03 |
| Market cap | $8.8B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/Elower is cheaper for the same earnings, not automatically better | 17.0 | n/a |
| 1-year return | -45% | +18% |
| 5-year return | +9.4% | +216% |
| Ryufin Smart Scoresector-relative, 1–10 | 7/10 | 4/10 |
Figures from SEC filings and end-of-day closes. Highlighting marks the higher or lower number, which is not the same as the better investment, a low P/E can be a warning and a high one can be deserved.
AECOM
Revenue of $3.8B in Q2 2026, net income $180M. Its largest reported line is Americas, 77% of the disclosed total.
Fluor Corporation
Revenue of $4.3B in Q2 2026, net income $114M. Its largest reported line is North America, 76% of the disclosed total.
Open these two in the interactive comparison to add more names, change the period or read the correlation.